Minimal Residual Disease is A Vital Marker for Patients with Multiple Myeloma, Says Expert

Video

Dr. Parameswaran Hari discusses the importance of understanding a patient’s MRD if they are receiving the maintenance therapy Sarclisa for multiple myeloma.

Data presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program demonstrated that the maintenance therapy Sarclisa (lenalidomide) improved progression-free survival in patients with multiple myeloma. However, according to Dr. Parameswaran Hari, more research is needed to assess the impact minimal residual disease has on patients receiving Sarclisa.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, a sister publication to CURE®, Hari, chief professor of oncology at the Medical College of Wisconsin, discussed further research of Sarclisa in patients with multiple myeloma and how minimal residual disease (MRD) is an important factor for these patients potentially receiving Sarclisa.

Transcription:

So, we have now randomized discontinuation studies going on in the U.S. right now. I'm involved with a study called the SWOG-1803 study, where we actually stratify patients at two years of maintenance based on whether they're minimal residual disease negative or not, and then we use that. If you’re minimal residual disease negative, you stop maintenance in a randomized fashion, (meaning) half the people stop (and) half the people continue. And if you’re minimal residual disease positive, then you actually continue on maintenance.

So that's the one way; and in this study, we don't have MRD at three years. We do have MRD at baseline and immediately after transplant, and at one year, etc. But we don't have it at the time that they were coming off of study. But that would be an interesting analysis that we hit. This was a substudy that went along with the study and that analysis will also be published later.

So, that'll also (show) us some light. The big question is 60%, who stopped lenalidomide maintenance, were still progression free at six years. All those people who are MRD negative, that's a good question. And the other 80%, it is very clear that there is some benefit if you look at the population as a whole, without additional predictors like MRD you really should be staying on lenalidomide.

Related Videos
Jessica McDade, B.S.N., RN, OCN, in an interview with CURE
For patients with cancer, the ongoing chemotherapy shortage may cause some anxiety as they wonder how they will receive their drugs. However, measuring drugs “down to the minutiae of the milligrams” helped patients receive the drugs they needed, said Alison Tray. Tray is an advanced oncology certified nurse practitioner and current vice president of ambulatory operations at Rutgers Cancer Institute in New Jersey.  If patients are concerned about getting their cancer drugs, Tray noted that having “an open conversation” between patients and providers is key.  “As a provider and a nurse myself, having that conversation, that reassurance and sharing the information is a two-way conversation,” she said. “So just knowing that we're taking care of you, we're going to make sure that you receive the care that you need is the key takeaway.” In June 2023, many patients were unable to receive certain chemotherapy drugs, such as carboplatin and cisplatin because of an ongoing shortage. By October 2023, experts saw an improvement, although the “ongoing crisis” remained.  READ MORE: Patients With Lung Cancer Face Unmet Needs During Drug Shortages “We’re really proud of the work that we could do and achieve that through a critical drug shortage,” Tray said. “None of our patients missed a dose of chemotherapy and we were able to provide that for them.” Tray sat down with CURE® during the 49th Annual Oncology Nursing Society Annual Congress to discuss the ongoing chemo shortage and how patients and care teams approached these challenges. Transcript: Particularly at Hartford HealthCare, when we established this infrastructure, our goal was to make sure that every patient would get the treatment that they need and require, utilizing the data that we have from ASCO guidelines to ensure that we're getting the optimal high-quality standard of care in a timely fashion that we didn't have to delay therapies. So, we were able to do that by going down to the minutiae of the milligrams on hand, particularly when we had a lot of critical drug shortages. So it was really creating that process to really ensure that every patient would get the treatment that they needed. For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.
Dr. Andrea Apolo in an interview with CURE
Dr. Kim in an interview with CURE
Dr. Nguyen, from Stanford Health, in an interview with CURE
Related Content